Sample Short Answer Essay for a College Application

The Common Application no longer requires a short answer essay from all applicants, but many colleges continue to include the short answer as part of a supplement. The short answer essay prompt typically states something like this: Briefly elaborate on one of your extracurricular activities or work experiences. Colleges like this type of question because it gives their applicants the opportunity to identify an activity that is meaningful to them and to explain why it is meaningful. This information can be useful to colleges with holistic admissions as they try to identify students who will bring interesting skills and passions to the campus community. Sample Short Answer Essay Christie wrote the following sample short answer essay to elaborate upon her love of running: It is the simplest of movements: right foot, left foot, right foot. It is the simplest of actions: run, relax, breathe. For me, running is both the most basic and the most complex activity I perform in any day. While my body adjusts to the challenges of gravel paths and steep inclines, my mind is free to drift, to sift through whatever needs sorting or disposing—the upcoming days tasks, an argument with a friend, some nagging stress. As my calf muscles loosen and my breathing settles into its deep rhythm, I am able to release that stress, forget that argument, and set my mind in order. And at the midway point, two miles into the course, I stop at the hilltop vista overlooking my little town and the surrounding woodlands. For just a moment, I stop to listen to my own strong heartbeat. Then I run again. Critique of the Short Answer Essay The author has focused on a personal activity, running, not any history-making achievement, team triumph, world-changing social work, or even a formal extracurricular activity. As such, the short answer essay does not highlight any kind of remarkable accomplishment or personal talent. But think about what this short answer essay does reveal—the author is someone who can find pleasure in the simplest of activities. She is someone who has found an effective way for dealing with stress and finding peace and equilibrium in her life. She reveals that she is in tune with her self and her small town environment. This one little paragraph gives us the impression that the author is a thoughtful, sensitive, and healthy person. In a short space, the essay reveals the maturity of the writer—she is reflective, articulate, and balanced. These are all dimensions of her character that will not come across in her lists of grades, test scores, and extracurricular activities. They are also personal qualities that will be attractive to a college. The writing is also solid. The prose is tight, clear, and stylistic without being over-written. The length is a perfect  823 characters and 148 words. This is a typical length limit for a short-answer essay. That said, if your college is asking for just 100 words or something longer, be sure to follow their instructions carefully. Role of Essays and Your College Application Keep in mind the role of any essays, even short ones, that you submit with your college application. You want to present a dimension of yourself that isnt readily apparent elsewhere in your application materials. Reveal some hidden interest, passion, or struggle that will give the admissions folks a more detailed portrait of yourself. The college has asked for a short essay because it has holistic admissions; in other words, the school tries to evaluate the whole applicant through both quantitative (grades, test scores, rank) and qualitative (essays, interview, extracurricular activities). A short answer essay gives the college a useful window into the applicants interests. Christie succeeds on this front. For both the writing and the content, she has written a winning short answer essay. You may want to explore another example of a  good short answer on working at Burger King  as well as learn lessons from a  weak short answer on soccer  and a  weak short answer on entrepreneurship. In general, if you follow the advice on writing a winning short answer and avoid common short answer mistakes, your essay will strengthen your application and help make you an attractive candidate for admission.

My Opinion On Literacy Ignorance Is A Negative Social...

My opinion in literacy Ignorance is a negative social phenomenon rampant in most of the Arab countries and the various countries, particularly developing ones? The concept differs illiteracy from state to state in the Arab countries, for example, mean illiteracy man who reached Second-year-old did not learn the principles of reading, writing and arithmetic in what language. In developed countries, such as Japan, the illiteracy person who has not reached the educational level that makes him understand written instructions in the technical subjects in his work. Phenomenon of illiteracy In the Arab countries to political and social reasons, economic and cultural recall. Including the large increase in population in the Arab countries, weak enough. Internal systems of education that lead to children dropping out of education do not apply of compulsory education fully in most Arab countries. Most of the deficit Arab governments for achieving the principle of equal educational opportunities, educational. There i s no Feasibility of actions taken on the fight against illiteracy, and adult education in the Arab country. In the Arab educational development there is low standard of living, and the low level of income in most Arab families. Counting the phenomenon of illiteracy of natural phenomena that characterize the Arab societies unfortunately. Literacy is needed from all societies in the world. There are many people who support this idea because they have friends or relatives whoShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesManagement Skills 8 †¢ Effective versus Successful Managerial Activities 8 †¢ A Review of the Manager’s Job 9 Enter Organizational Behavior 10 Complementing Intuition with Systematic Study 11 Disciplines That Contribute to the OB Field 13 Psychology 14 †¢ Social Psychology 14 †¢ Sociology 14 †¢ Anthropology 14 There Are Few Absolute s in OB 14 Challenges and Opportunities for OB 15 Responding to Economic Pressures 15 †¢ Responding to Globalization 16 †¢ Managing Workforce Diversity 18 †¢ Improving Customer ServiceRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesperspectives on the past) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-4399-0269-1 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-1-4399-0270-7 (paper : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-1-4399-0271-4 (electronic) 1. History, Modern—20th century. 2. Twentieth century. 3. Social history—20th century. 4. World politics—20th century. I. Adas, Michael, 1943– II. American Historical Association. D421.E77 2010 909.82—dc22 2009052961 The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National StandardRead MoreStrategic Marketing Management337596 Words   |  1351 Pagesfrom the Library of Congress ISBN 0 7506 5938 6 For information on all Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann publications visit our website at http:/ /books.elsevier.com Printed and bound in Italy Working together to grow libraries in developing countries www.elsevier.com | www.bookaid.org | www.sabre.org Contents Preface Overview of the book’s structure 1 Introduction 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Learning objectives The nature of marketing The management process Strategic decisions and the nature

The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts Free Essays

string(40) " radical shifts from the Neoclassicism\." Artistes have always painted scenes of war from the Ancient worlds of Egypt and Greece. The relief inside the Abu Simbel Temple showing Ramses in the Battle of Kadesh and of his victory over the Hittites is an excellent example. The Athena Frieze depicting the battle of Greeks against the Persians, which are some of the earliest example of a specific historical event being, sculptured (Greek Art). We will write a custom essay sample on The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts or any similar topic only for you Order Now To the photographs that are coming from the current war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the flagged draped coffins of the dead in the cargo hull on their way home. In the periods of art, before Goya’s the Third of May tended to glorify war and make it seem romantic and heroic without the effects of the bloodshed and horrors that war brings. Benjamin West’s The Death of General Wolfe does show the effect of war, however, he has made a martyr of General Wolfe surrounded by his officers making this painting seems to be Romanizing the death (Class Lecture-The Neoclassical 2 of 3). Benjamin West was an American Neoclassical painter who turned art historical order upside down by not depicting a classical theme and used clothing of the time (Gehmacaher). The Neoclassical period of art was a reaction to the Baroque and Rococo style of art where a renewed interest for classical antiquity of the ancient Greek and Roman seeking the geometric harmony of the time (Kleiner 330). The Neoclassical period of art was during the Enlightenment period where critical thinking of the world and humankind spurred the great political, social and economic changes resulted in Revolutions in France and America (Kleiner 319). Writers such as Rousseau, Voltaire, and Jefferson help the change the critical thinking in political, social and economic toward humankind and what was going on in the world helped inspired the French and American Revolutions (Class Lecture-The Neoclassical 1 of 3). This influenced the people to put a new light on all thinking and question the traditional ideas and ways of doing things whether it was in painting, sculpture, writing, science, politics, and nature (Smart History). The Death of General Wolfe is the final stages of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham, which takes place in Quebec, Canada, when the French and British fought during the Seven Year’s War for control of Canada or as it was called then New France (Gehmacher). General Wolfe, a British officer, won the battle but lost his life in this campaign on September 13, 1759, the French surrendered Quebec five days later and by 1760 surrendered in Montreal after a failed attempt to regain control of the capital (BBC). West has distorted the events surrounding General Wolfe death to heighten the drama in this painting (Gehmacher). West does not depict General Wolfe in armor like that of ancient soldiers but he has paid close attention to the details of the uniforms and the clothes of the Indians (Stacey). To me, West has made a martyr of General Wolfe by having him surrounded by his officers and Indians with the front lines not far off. This also glorifies and romanizes war, everyone around the dying General seem unaffected by the battle that is raging nearby. Jacques-Louis David preferred the ancient and Renaissance works, and agreed with the Enlightenment philosophy that the subject matter should have a moral balance reflect the artwork of ancient times and depicting noble events in history would civil virtues and patriotism (Kleiner 332) inspire. David’s Oath of the Horatii is an excellent example of the Enlightenment philosophy and of Neoclassical style. David became the painter of French Revolution and was on the board that voted to behead the King; he also became the official painter for Napoleon (Zucker). Oath of the Horatii is keeping with the neoclassical style, by the David has used colors and by classicizing contemporary subject matter (Gersh-Nesic). David has used diagonal movements with heroic poses of the father and sons, and grouping the women behind the focus of the painting to give this painting the classic feel, that it has (The Neoclassical 3 of 3). Oath of the Horatii is about three brothers swearing on oath on their swords with their father gives them, the sons swear to fight to the death for their country (Zucker). David has a group of women that seem in despair over the oath of the brothers, he has also bathed the women in light to show their despair. David has used the dark archways to give depth to this painting and light on the swords and arms of the brothers to show their bond with their father. The one thing I have noticed about David style of painting is that has fluidness about his work and there are no brush strokes visible. David’s male figures appear statuesque and virile like the ancient Greek and Roman soldiers; he has also used soft colors to make this painting more alluring and dramatic. This painting like that of West seems to glorify the act of war. These painting are done in the Neoclassical style but they both have a different feel to them. West’s has the act of dying on the battlefield and has used the clothing of the times and no reference to the past. David on the other hand has depicted an ancient Roman scene. To me this is the last art period that depicts war as heroic and glorifies it. The Romantics were about getting back to nature and the common people to evoke individualism, subjectivism, imagination and emotions (Romanticism). The Romantics were the first group of artists to turn away from the academic style of the Neoclassical, this movement started in the late 18th century and early 19th century because of the Napoleonic wars (Romanticism). The transition from Neoclassicism was a shift from reason to feeling and uses the social and political climate to draw their inspiration (Kleiner 340). Goya, a Spanish Romantic artist, Third of May is an example of the radical shifts from the Neoclassicism. You read "The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts" in category "Papers" Here Goya has used light and dark to emphasis the scene that is unfolding before us. The Spanish King, Charles IV, asked Napoleon to help Spain defend them against Great Britain, Napoleon saw this as a weakness and took control of Spain by putting his brother in control of Spain (Zucker). The Spanish who first liked the idea of the French getting rid of the British, the Spanish people soon realized the French as invaders and on the 2nd of May, the Spanish attacked Napoleon’s men in a violent clash (Kleiner 341). Napoleon’s men then responded by executing several Spanish citizens, Goya is painting that massacre. The Third of May is the result and Goya has done an excellent job here is showing the senseless act by the French soldiers. Goya has used the light on the man in the front with his arms outreached about to be executed to draw your attention to the brutal act of the soldiers and to evoke empathy to common man. Goya has the French soldiers back to the viewer so they cannot see their face to show the injustice unfolding. He has used the mountain or hill in the background to show the people as trapped and no way to get away from the soldiers and dead bodies around to show how helpless these people are (Zucker). Goya has used several things to draw attention to what is going on in this painting, the rifles pointing at the man in the white shirt on his knees, the blood in on the ground in front of him, the lantern to shed light on the man about to be shot and his face that shows no fear. All of this helps show the ruthlessness of the French soldiers. He has also used earth tones in this painting with strong brushstrokes and used shadows that show the Romantic styles break from the Neoclassical style. While I find this painting, somewhat disturbing Goya has used his coloring, shadowing, and lines to draw to viewer into this painting and feel the helplessness of the Spanish people and Goya has made a martyr of the man about to be shot. Realism was a moment the developed out of the Industrial Revolution when artist in France rejected the fantastic and focused on the reality of the world and painted the everyday life (Photography and Realism 4 of 6). Painters like Gustave Courbet and Jean-Francois Millet painted wonderful scenes of the everyday peasant life in The Stone Breakers and The Gleaners but it was during this time that photography came into the world and could capture life and preserve that moment forever. Timothy O’Sullivan’s photography A Harvest of Death, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania shows the true horrors of war; this was taken after one of the worst battles during the American Civil War. The Civil War was due to the Industrial Revolution effects of the northern states becoming more industrial than the south that was still an agricultural society that was using slaves for the work. In this photograph, there is a fog over the battlefield in the distance you can see men on horses, as you look closer at the dead soldiers you can see that the Confederate soldiers’ shoes have been removed. The shoes of the dead were removed for use of surviving soldiers who needed them and it did not stop at the shoes for once again the Confederate soldiers’ pockets have been gone through for their pockets appear turned out (Cornell University). This photography shows the true reality of the horrors of war in the awful details this photography has taken. Photographs of other wars also show the horrible reality of war, and the power of the picture speaks for the horrors of war. The photos of the oncentrations camps after World War II are excellent examples of man’s inhumanity to man, and I will not describe any of these here because to are too horrific to look at. The photograph of the flag being raised on Iwo Jima shows six men raising an American flag after a battle for the island. This picture is showing a simple act of raising the flag to show their support for their country. While this photo does not show the horrors of war, it shows that despite the battle that fough t and the loss of life there can be a simple act that defines us. Then there is the photograph of the aftermath of a napalm attack in Vietnam taken by Nick Ut, here you see Vietnamese children running through the streets screaming and one little girl has no clothes on, soldiers are behind the children and in the background you can see the smoke of the bombs. Photographer Ut said that he had seen two airplanes and each one dropped four bombs and minutes later he saw the people running away and the little girl that appears to be the focus of the image yelling for water because she was to hot (BBC News). The terrified face of the children screaming speaks volumes in this photo and shows how war affects everyone not just the soldiers fighting the battles. Photographs show the reality of war in unflinching view, while painters interrupt what they see. The German Expressionists did just that after World War I. German Expressionists used disorganized outlines and angry brushstrokes to connive their message in their works and to illustrate the injustice of society that was growing during this time of global uncertainty (German Expressionism). There were several movements in the German Expressionist; the first was called Der Brucke (The Bridge), Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider) and Neue Sachlickeit (New Objectivity). Franz Marc was one of the founders of the Der Blaue Reiter, which got its name from Marc and Vassily Kandinsky’s interest in horses and the color blue (Kleiner 386). However, Marc did not paint Fate of the Animals during World War I, but while serving during the war he wrote a letter to his wife that â€Å"is like a premonition of this war—horrible and shattering. I can hardly conceive that I painted it† (Kleiner 388). Here Marc is showing us a forest that is being destroyed uses vivid colors and jagged forms to connive his message (Labedzki). I have used this painting because I think had Marc lived through World War I, he would have painted another form of this to show the horrors he saw during that time. He said to his wife that this was a premonition; I can only image what he would have painted after the war. Wilhelm Heinrich Otto Dix, known for his work under the name Otto Dix, was a German Expressionists in the Neue Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity). This movement formed after World War I by artist that severed in the German army and their experiences military influenced their art (Kleiner 400). Otto Dix’s aim was to show the world those experiences with wrenching, ruthless and harsh depictions of the war as depicted in his Shock Troops Advance under Gas and The Trench (Henshaw). The Trench is filled dead bodies at different stages of decomposition did cause a public outcry that the museum director show the painting was forced to resign (WWI, Otto Dix). Dix said of his work â€Å"that life is not colorful at all. It is much darker, quieter in its tonality, much simpler. I wanted to depict things as they really are† (Heller). Dix depicted the war as it actually was and drew great criticism for his works with the war as the subject. Dix’s medium for Shock Troops Advance under Gas was an etching, portraying the soldiers need to wear gas masks due to the invention of mustard gas used in World War I. Once again showing man’s inhumanity to man. This reminds me of Munch’s Scream. How to cite The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts, Essays

Compare and contrast the way Seamus Heaney and D H Lawrence Essay Example For Students

Compare and contrast the way Seamus Heaney and D H Lawrence Essay In this essay I shall be examining poems from two famous poets Seamus Heaney and D. H Lawrence. Both write about their childhood experiences and express their feelings and memories through their poetry and use poetic devices to help the reader identify with and visualise these. The poets techniques and memories are similar in some ways, yet vividly contrast in others. I shall begin with studying two poems by Seamus Heaney Digging and Mid term break, which deal with feelings about his father and the loss of his brother. I shall then compare these to two of D. H Lawrences poems Piano and Discord in Childhood, which are Lawrences recollections about his parents and their relationship. Seamus Heaney grew up on a farm in Ireland, and many of his poems are recollections of his early rural experiences. They are journeys of innocence and changing attitudes as he matured from a child to a man. Seamus used the creation process of poetry as a way of discovery about how he felt and how that impacts his life now. As he writes he paints a vivid picture in the mind of the reader of the characters and places he describes through poetic devices and his use of language. In the poem Digging Seamus Heaney explores the relationship between the previous generations of his family digging and working the land, and how he broke this tradition and became a poet. This must have been a very difficult decision for Heaney to make and throughout the poem; the reader gets an insight as to how Seamus feels about this. In the fifth stanza, Heaney states his father could handle a spade just like his old man showing that this tradition has been carrying on for a long time and therefore emphasising that this was a very hard thing for him to break away from. Another place where we get an insight into Heaneys thoughts is in the penultimate stanza where Heaney says he has no spade to follow men like them. This verse sounds self-pitying at a first glance; however we know that Seamus was capable of becoming a farmer as he is well educated in the subject, which we are aware of due to the large amount of technical language he uses, making it even more unlikely that Seamus would opt out of carrying on the family tradition. The rhyme scheme supports this as it is inconsistent and Seamus had broken the pattern of his ancestors making the family tradition inconsistent. He has no spade to follow them with, only a pen which he will use to dig in his own way. In the poem Seamus manages to find some similarities between physically digging and poetry. Firstly, poetry is rhythmic, just like digging, as his father is described as stooping in rhythm as he works the land. Also, poetry is very technical, as is digging as it is described in stanza three. Thirdly, symbolism is used when it says to scatter the new potatoes we had picked, loving their cool hardness in our hands. This shows that there is a good product which arises from digging, and you can be proud of and enjoy this, just as a poem is a pleasing finished product of writing. Seamus is apparently comfortable with writing, as we are told the squat pen rests, snug as a gun just as his father was comfortable with digging (the coarse boot nestled on the lug)Finally Heaney links the roots his father struggles to dig up to the living roots which he awakens in his head by writing. This is a powerful metaphor linking poetry to digging, and expresses that Seamus feels that his personal form of digging is more important to him, as he is dealing with the living roots The poem also explores Seamus relationship between him and his father. We know Seamus has a lot of respect for his father as he says By God, the old man could handle a spade which exclaims his praise for him. He also admires his grandfather and states with pride that he could cut more turf in a day than any other man on Toners bog, he is proud of his grandfathers achievements. He also admires the fact that they fell to right away and were dedicated to their work. The poem also shows the simplicity of their life (corked sloppily with paper) and the fact that his childhood shaped his life as he likens his memories to roots which anchor something and do not allow it to move. The strength of the memories shows that these two people had a great impression on Heaneys life; however he cannot and does not wish to follow in their footsteps. The poem is a journey down and down into Heaneys mind and feelings. The rhyme scheme supports this as it is inconsistent not blank verse, allowing freedom of thought. It was written during a pause in writing as the pen rests and he concludes by saying the squat pen rests. Ill dig with it. This link between the spade and pen shows that Seamus has reached a decision where he understands that he cannot follow them, regardless of how big an impact they had on his life, nor feel guilty about his decision he can only dig in his own way. The second poem I have chosen to examine is Mid-Term Break. It explores the feelings of Seamus Heaney and his family about the death of his four year old brother. Although the poem is not overly sentimental, it contains a lot of emotion, and gives the reader a good insight into Heaneys feelings and also how his mother and father react to this tragedy. The poem is on a universal theme loss, and Seamus recalls his first experience of this. It is written in a nai ve and unsure way, due to the simplicity of the writing. Seamus Heaney, as a poet, would undoubtedly have a wide range of vocabulary; showing that the poet wanted to convey that it was written from a childs point of view. This makes the poem even more poignant and emotionally distressing to the reader. The poem shows how Seamus feels about the loss of his brother. The only emotion Heaney expresses is embarrassment which shows that he did not know how to deal with what was happening maybe because it was his first experience of loss. However, it is clear that this is not all he felt. The events and the outcome are slowly revealed, implying that Seamus took a long time to come to terms with this. Book Review (Betrayal of Work) EssayHowever quite a few of the techniques the poets use are similar, such as neither poet writes poems with great sentiment showing that the two are strong and products of their experiences. They both rely on creating sounds in their poetry through the use of onomatopoeia, assonance and alliteration. Their poems are powerful, concise and full of symbolism. The second poem I have chosen to examine by D. H Lawrence is Piano. In the poem, Lawrence looks back to his childhood and the way his mother made him feel and the memories he associates with her. This nostalgic poem is both positive and negative as he fondly thinks of the past which makes him realise what he had then yet he can never go back there. The poem is very revealing about the emotions D. H Lawrence associates with his mother. The poem begins in a very harmonious situation a complete contrast to Discord in childhood where the opening stanza sets the scene for the aggression to come. The harmony is symbolic of the close relationship between Lawrence and his mother. He is describes as a child sitting under the piano showing that Lawrence is looking up to his mother perhaps representing the admiration he feels for her. This is similar to how Seamus Heaney feels for and respects his father, as examplified in the poem Digging. D. H Lawrence feels safe with his mother and the boom which scared him in Discord in childhood is now a protective one; not bruising. The word choices throughout the first stanza are all gentle such as softly and tingling, which convey the mood and how he feels in his mothers presence, and the rhyme scheme is consistent, representing the constant pillar of strength his mother was to him. The parlour is described as cosy with winter outside. In Discord in childhood, the bad weather outside is pathetic fallacy for the mood within the house, however in Piano, the winter outside merely contrasts the love inside the house making is cosy, and the protection he feels inside the house. It is clear that his father is not in this poem, which is quite a positive memory. This is significant, as it shows that Lawrence associates most of the happy moments in his childhood with his mother, and the discord he felt are memories he links to his father. This contrasts Seamus Heaneys poetry, where many positive recollections are associated with his father, and the admiration Seamus felt for him. In fact on the whole, Heaney has written more poetry containing his father than his mother. The singing and playing in Piano is metaphoric of how Lawrences mother made him feel just as the fight in Discord in childhood symbolised the violent relationship of his parents. The poem also exposes how D. H Lawrence felt about these happy moments in his childhood. He describes the piano as their guide, which could mean that when he no longer could spend this quality and calm time with his mother, he lost his guide and now he is lost and deserted. This shows just how important D. H Lawrences mother was to him. Although this is a positive memory, Lawrence says In spite of myself the insidious mastery of song betrays me back.. with hymns in the cosy parlour, showing that he does not wish to remember these times, as it emphasises how sad he is now especially since he lost his mother. The memories make him upset as it is in vain for him to return to his childhood. He says the glamour of childish days in upon me know, which is an unusual choice of words, but again means that the best is behind him and that his childhood was very special. It is somewhat odd to think that D. H Lawrence would think of his childhood like this, as another word he used to describe it was discord, but tells the reader that the love from his mother and the happiness he felt when he was with her can override the bad experiences he also had in his earlier years. The strength of these memories is shown through the big passionate words which he uses, and the onomatopoeia strengthens these images in the mind of the reader. D. H Lawrence says that his manhood is cast meaning that he is a product of his experiences and he cannot change that. Seamus Heaney too believes that he too is a creation of his experiences, but instead views this as a good thing because it gives him living roots in his head which he can turn into poetry. The circular structure of this poem is similar to that in Discord in childhood where the ongoing storm conveys the ongoing violence between his parents. The fact that the poem is not concluded but returns to the beginning shows that D. H Lawrence has not concluded these feelings he has not yet learnt how to deal with them. D. H Lawrence and Seamus Heaney are both poets who use poetry to express their feelings about their childhood. Both write in different styles and express different emotions. Whilst Seamus Heaney enjoyed a quiet and secure childhood, growing up on a farm, D. H Lawrence experienced great discord in his childhood, however these bad memories are sometimes overridden by the loving moments he shared with his mother. Seamus Heaney had great respect for his father who always took things in his stride and was devastated that he could not carry on the family tradition. On the other hand, D. H Lawrence greatly disliked his father and the way his father treated his mother. Few of the memories of his father are positive, and he is described as a booming and bruising character. However there are some similarities between the poets. Both feel a great sense of love towards one (or in Heaneys case both) of their parents, and have fond recollections of times spent with them. Even so, their poems are not overly sentimental, yet appeal to the readers emotions in other ways. Heaney and Lawrence believe they are products of their own experiences and use symbolism and other poetic techniques to strengthen these experiences when they are transferred onto paper in the form of poetry.